In my early adulthood, I never questioned the truth of my negative feelings. In fact, they often felt like the “real me.” I made many informal attempts at my own brand of learned optimism, and I was often happy and delighted with life. But when adversity hit, the positive emotional states seemed rather fragile. They were, I believed, “fake”.
As I expanded my knowledge and experience in the field of clinical social work, I learned and experienced the powerful value of challenging solidly-embedded negative thoughts.
Many theories and techniques exist to challenge and replace negative thinking with heartfelt positivity. The Irrepressible Writer will continue to explore and describe those ways, and I hope you’ll continue to share the experiment, and share the impact on your writing lives.
I’ve written here that the ability to journey towards heartfelt positivity rests on the belief that the negative thinking is incorrect or irrational (i.e., not based on factual evidence). We know that it is limiting to us as writers…and in our non-writing lives.
My first introduction to the power of disbelief in limited thinking (not only negative thinking, by the way) was Edward de Bono. De Bono created the concept and tools of Lateral Thinking. He was among the first who believed that creativity could be taught, stimulated by a variety of techniques that gained broad acceptance. If you’re familiar with the concept of “six thinking hats”, that’s de Bono.
Reading about and implementing some of de Bono’s techniques moved me beyond what I felt might be the boundaries of my psychodynamic/psychoanalytic training into the world of cognition, and of creativity “not as a magical gift but as a learnable skill” (de Bono). It helped me, and it helped clients, to move beyond places where we might feel emotionally or intellectually stuck.
One simple tool, which de Bono calls “provocation”, opened a huge door. You might want to play with it:
Here’s an example of a provocation:
1. STATE A NEGATIVE THOUGHT, for example: “I’m not able to compete in the current writing climate. I’ll never get past the bigger and bigger gates that are getting set up everyday.”
2. GIVE YOURSELF A PROVOCATION: de Bono used the word “po” to signal: “This statement is not true.” (Say it loudly: “Po!”)
3. IF “PO” IS TRUE (so therefore the original statement in #1 is NOT TRUE) THEN WHAT ELSE MIGHT BE TRUE?:
- I might have greater writing ability or capacity than I think;
- I might at least have the ability to work harder than I think;
- I might be more open to looking for and creating opportunities to meet editors and agents at conferences;
- I might re-allocate some priorities if I believed that going to conferences might help my access;
- I might feel more inspired to polish a piece to submit to a conference if I wanted a critique;
- etcetera
“What if…?” It’s a phrase familiar to writers as we plot. It opens doors for our characters and our stories.
But what if you use “what if” on yourself, as well?
What if when you have negative thoughts you aren’t just depressed or depleted…What if you’re wrong?









The negative part of me is saying, “what if I’m right?” It’s very stubborn, that negative me, but it has been proven wrong in the past . Not that it’s willing to admit that.
Maybe I should start keeping a chart of all the times its been wrong so I can wave the evidence in its face the next time it starts mouthing off.
Thanks for the reminder that the negative part of us isn’t necessarily right. A useful thing to keep in mind.
Great idea, Lisa – keeping track of “evidence”…I love it!
This is a great reminder for me. I’m working on a story and my thoughts are bouncing all over the place. Yes, it’s working. No, it’s not working. Should I be working on something else? Am I wasting my time with this one?
So, now I’m going to say: I might not see some great things in my story if I don’t keep working on it. I’ll never know what this story could become if I don’t see it thru.
Thanks, Carol!!
Hi, Paul – I love the idea that something wonderful could be waiting (or lurking) in the story-to-be that we’ll never discover unless we journey through. I think your point also applies to our tendency to wonder if time’s been “wasted” in the past when, for example, we’ve done many multiples of revisions.
Were they all “necessary”? Did we “waste” time? I have to remind myself that for one reason or another, each one needed to be done. Might I change things in the future, learn from my process? Sure…so then, there’s been no waste at all.